Take Your Damn Quote Back To Ohio!

We recently passed the 150th anniversary of the Battle of  Shiloh which prompts me to discuss a quotation which bothers me.  Anyone who has read a modern book on Shiloh has probably seen some variation on “Take your damned regiment back to Ohio.  There is no enemy closer than Corinth.”  Allegedly this statement was the message conveyed by a staff officer from General Sherman to the Colonel of the 53rd Ohio the day before the battle.

Is the quote believable? The same day that the remark was supposedly made Sherman wrote a report of an encounter with the enemy that had occurred the previous afternoon.  His report states that “I infer that the enemy is in some considerable force at Pea Ridge”.  Thus it is clear that Sherman knew there was enemy closer than Corinth.  So why would he say “no enemy closer than Corinth”?

Where did the quote come from? Sherman never claimed to have said it and was dead before it appeared in print.  It first appeared in a paper read by Ephraim C. Dawes in the early 1890s at a meeting of the Ohio Commandery of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States (MOLLUS). His paper was later published as “My First Day Under Fire at Shiloh” appearing in several collections of essays about the war. Dawes had been a staff officer in the 53rd Ohio at the time of the battle.  Why did he wait until 30 years after the battle, and just after Sherman’s death, to tell his tale?

To me the quote doesn’t fit with what Sherman was reporting on April 5 and the fact that it only surfaced  long after the event makes its veracity even more doubtful. Yet authors repeatedly use this quote with certainty.  Why?  My impression is that the quote is used to give credence to the claim that Sherman was clueless about the enemy presence. Whatever the reason, it seems to have been accepted too readily.


One response to “Take Your Damn Quote Back To Ohio!”

  1. LetUsHavePeace Avatar

    Ned B.’s comments deserve appreciation. Those of us who have studied the history of Grant’s reputation for “drunkenness” find the same quality to many of the anecdotes. They were published by people who did not know Grant or did not like him. Grant and Sherman’s “cluelessness” (sic) at Shiloh is part of the “bloodbath” narrative for the Civil War that allows the amateur soldiers to blame the professionals for the carnage. (Dawes was one of the amateurs, having just graduated from Marietta College in 1861.) Since Dawes was not even a Major at Shiloh, the notion that his regiment’s Colonel would have shared a remark of Sherman’s with a junior officer who was not on his staff seems more than a bit fanciful. Dawes was dedicated to the notion that there was an “Aristocracy of Patriotism” that included all veterans of the Civil War, amateurs and professionals, without distinction. That is not an opinion Sherman or Grant shared, even if Grant was tactful enough not to mention it. Tact was never one of Sherman’s virtues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *