Number 1 (March 2009)

by Brett Schulte on April 6, 2009 · 2 comments

Web Site

Civil War History, Volume 55, Number 1 (March 2009)

Civil War History, Volume 55, Number 1 (March 2009)

112 Pages

Page 5

Proslavery Professors: Classic Natural Right and the Positive Good Argument in Antebellum Virginia

by Chad Vanderford

In the 1850s Professors in Virginia moved away from an argument for slavery as a “necessary evil” and instead started calling it a “positive good”.  Vanderford argues that these professors used the idea of Classic Natural Right to explain slavery as a positive good in a “legitimate, if nevertheless, unfortunate way.”

Page 31

“For the Good of the Cause and the Protection of the Border”: The Service of the Indiana Legion in the Civil War, 1861-1865

by John Michael Foster Jr.

The Indiana Legion was Indian’s active militia force during the Civil War.  Its units helped patrol the southern border of Indiana to protect against Confederate raiders, rounded up deserters and political dissenters, quelled unrest, and acted to reduce fears of state residents about Confederate invasions.  The Legion was often poorly armed, poorly paid, and ineffective.  They were especially unable to contain veteran raiders such as John Hunt Morgan’s Confederate cavalry.  However, says Foster, the Legion also succeeded in many ways, especially in preventing even more guerrilla incursions and by supplying a ready host of trained manpower for Indiana’s front line units in the war.  In the end, according to the author, the Indiana Legion was not as good as the best militia organizations in the North, but it was better than some, especially states which had no organized militia.

Page 56

“Far Above Our Poor Power to Add or Detract”: National Park Service Administration of the Gettysburg Battlefield, 1933-1938

by Jennifer M. Murray

The National Park Service took over the day to day operations of Gettysburg National Battlefield in 1933. Jenniefer Murray’s article focuses on the efforts of the NPS’ first five years in charge.  The first NPS Superintendent, James R. McConaghie, had a background in architecture rather than history.  Though the NPS did some positive things in its first five years at Gettysburg, such as improving infrastructure such as roads and visitor amenities and providing visitors with more opportunities to learn about the battle, it also left some unfortunate legacies, including a complete redesign of the National Cemetery, the destruction of the historically significant Forney Farm, and an emphasis on farming the battlefield for profit which unfortunately changed the landscape greatly from its 1863 appearance.  This last shortcoming is only now beginning to be rectified by the National Park Service in an effort to allow visitors to see what soldiers saw in 1863.

Page 82

Book Reviews

Page 102

Endnotes


***

Check out the Siege of Petersburg Online for daily posts on battle accounts in newspaper articles, diary entries, letters and more!

What are your Top 10 Gettysburg Books? See what a panel of bloggers said recently.

Want to read some interesting Civil War content from amateurs and pros alike? Check out the Top 10 Civil War Blogs and Top 10 Civil War Blogs: 11-20.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

James McConaghie May 12, 2009 at 7:28 pm

Jennifer M. Murray does a disservice to my grandfather. She states he had a background in architecture rather than history. His background was in fact Landscape Architecture, (the design of Parks?) which he studied at both Harvard and Oxford, England. I also believe he learned something of history as an Army officer in Europe in 1917. I must withhold comment on the rest of her article as this one paragraph was all I have been able to find so far.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }