<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Blue and Gray Diplomacy: A History of Union and Confederate Foreign Relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2010/03/03/review-blue-and-gray-diplomacy-a-history-of-union-and-confederate-foreign-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2010/03/03/review-blue-and-gray-diplomacy-a-history-of-union-and-confederate-foreign-relations/</link>
	<description>Informed Amateurs Blog the American Civil War</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2010/03/03/review-blue-and-gray-diplomacy-a-history-of-union-and-confederate-foreign-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-6943</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=8021#comment-6943</guid>
		<description>I still want to know how this book differs from &lt;i&gt;Union in Peril&lt;/i&gt; and why a book that effectively ends in late 1862 really qualifies as a history of Civil War diplomacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still want to know how this book differs from <i>Union in Peril</i> and why a book that effectively ends in late 1862 really qualifies as a history of Civil War diplomacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2010/03/03/review-blue-and-gray-diplomacy-a-history-of-union-and-confederate-foreign-relations/comment-page-1/#comment-6941</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=8021#comment-6941</guid>
		<description>Interesting, and I think you&#039;re right that morality played a far lesser part than is generally supposed. One consideration seldom mentioned is British fear of Yankee commerce raiders. These had done a great deal of damage in the previous wars, and Empire commerce remained vulnerable. Imagine a dozen Alabamas flying the Stars and Stripes loose on the oceans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and I think you&#8217;re right that morality played a far lesser part than is generally supposed. One consideration seldom mentioned is British fear of Yankee commerce raiders. These had done a great deal of damage in the previous wars, and Empire commerce remained vulnerable. Imagine a dozen Alabamas flying the Stars and Stripes loose on the oceans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

