<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: The Army of Tennessee by Thomas L. Connelly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/11/10/review-the-army-of-tennessee-by-thomas-l-connelly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/11/10/review-the-army-of-tennessee-by-thomas-l-connelly/</link>
	<description>The Order of Civil War Obsessively Compulsed - Informed Amateurs Blog the American Civil War</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sfcdan</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/11/10/review-the-army-of-tennessee-by-thomas-l-connelly/comment-page-1/#comment-6192</link>
		<dc:creator>sfcdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=7657#comment-6192</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more. These books are classics. They should be a part of every Civil War collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more. These books are classics. They should be a part of every Civil War collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hallstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/11/10/review-the-army-of-tennessee-by-thomas-l-connelly/comment-page-1/#comment-6181</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hallstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=7657#comment-6181</guid>
		<description>Hello TOCWOC

This book and the second volume were some of the first books I read on the main western confederate army.   They created an interest for me in the western theater that continues to this day.   I thought they were the closest thing to what Freeman did with Lee&#039;s Lieutenants.    

I do think this area of The Civil War is ripe for more study.   At one time it was rumored that Richard McMurray was working on a history of this confederate army.   I&#039;ve heard nothing about this for quite a while.  Perhaps there is someone else considering a similar history?

Connelly did a wonderful job with both volumes.  Thanks for bringing these books back into focus with your review.

Regards
Don Hallstrom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello TOCWOC</p>
<p>This book and the second volume were some of the first books I read on the main western confederate army.   They created an interest for me in the western theater that continues to this day.   I thought they were the closest thing to what Freeman did with Lee&#8217;s Lieutenants.    </p>
<p>I do think this area of The Civil War is ripe for more study.   At one time it was rumored that Richard McMurray was working on a history of this confederate army.   I&#8217;ve heard nothing about this for quite a while.  Perhaps there is someone else considering a similar history?</p>
<p>Connelly did a wonderful job with both volumes.  Thanks for bringing these books back into focus with your review.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Don Hallstrom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
