<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Seceded State of Kanawha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/01/18/the-seceded-state-of-kanawha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/01/18/the-seceded-state-of-kanawha/</link>
	<description>Informed Amateurs Blog the American Civil War</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kentuckian</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/01/18/the-seceded-state-of-kanawha/comment-page-1/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kentuckian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=2381#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>They should change the name back to Kanawha and make &quot;Charleston&quot; &quot;Kanawha City&quot; (I guess the neighborhood of that name could be renamed &quot;Charleston&quot; LOL.) After all, there&#039;s already a more famous Charleston in S.C., and Virginia actually extends west of *West* Virginia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should change the name back to Kanawha and make &#8220;Charleston&#8221; &#8220;Kanawha City&#8221; (I guess the neighborhood of that name could be renamed &#8220;Charleston&#8221; LOL.) After all, there&#8217;s already a more famous Charleston in S.C., and Virginia actually extends west of *West* Virginia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/01/18/the-seceded-state-of-kanawha/comment-page-1/#comment-4206</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=2381#comment-4206</guid>
		<description>Aside from Constitutionality, the real question is did West Virginians want a state of their own? I have read the records of the Wheeling Conventions and there is actually no evidence that a significant number wanted to split from Virginia. This very question was asked by the Lt. Gov. Daniel Polsley at the 2nd Convention in August 1861. He wanted proof of the &quot;clamor&quot; and all he was told was that there were 3 or 4 petitions of some 700 names.  One delegate said his constituents wanted nothing short of separation. The only trouble is that he represented a Secessionist county, so I don&#039;t think he was speaking for the majority. A few weeks after that they decided to offer a referendum, at which only 34% of the voters participated, and if you include all 50 counties it drops to 28%. There is also the issue of Ohio soldiers accounting for almost the entire vote of Hampshire county. Historians have done a very poor job in writing about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from Constitutionality, the real question is did West Virginians want a state of their own? I have read the records of the Wheeling Conventions and there is actually no evidence that a significant number wanted to split from Virginia. This very question was asked by the Lt. Gov. Daniel Polsley at the 2nd Convention in August 1861. He wanted proof of the &#8220;clamor&#8221; and all he was told was that there were 3 or 4 petitions of some 700 names.  One delegate said his constituents wanted nothing short of separation. The only trouble is that he represented a Secessionist county, so I don&#8217;t think he was speaking for the majority. A few weeks after that they decided to offer a referendum, at which only 34% of the voters participated, and if you include all 50 counties it drops to 28%. There is also the issue of Ohio soldiers accounting for almost the entire vote of Hampshire county. Historians have done a very poor job in writing about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elektratig</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2009/01/18/the-seceded-state-of-kanawha/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>elektratig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=2381#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Fred,

There&#039;s actually a strong case to be made that the formation of West Virginia was constitutional.  It gets technical, but you can find the article &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=371340&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s actually a strong case to be made that the formation of West Virginia was constitutional.  It gets technical, but you can find the article <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=371340" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

