<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fiction Review: The Shenandoah Spy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2008/11/15/fiction-review-the-shenandoah-spy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2008/11/15/fiction-review-the-shenandoah-spy/</link>
	<description>Informed Amateurs Blog the American Civil War</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:41:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Hamit</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2008/11/15/fiction-review-the-shenandoah-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Hamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=2098#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Well, I appreciate the review.  The reason for the sex scenes is the published libel of Belle as &quot;an accomplished prostitute&quot; in the New York Herald by the reporter William Clark in the week after the Battle of Front Royal.  It was a creative choice that not everyone is happy with, but one I stand by, given that the seduction of and by Captain Keily is essential to the narrative line.  Were it not for that Belle would not have had the opportunity to spy on the Union Army staff meeting and tell Ashby of the Union plans to trap Jackson. 

I don&#039;t write for children.  Sex was part of the mix, as were Victorian attitudes about love and marriage.  Belle&#039;s sacrifice here cost her reputation and any hope of a &quot;normal&quot; life after the war.

As for Mati Hari:  That&#039;s World War One.  As incredible as it may seem now, Belle&#039;s role as a spy was well know and widely published and she was reputed to be as beautiful and seductive as Cleopatra.  That &quot;Confederate Cleopatra was widely used as a short hand description of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I appreciate the review.  The reason for the sex scenes is the published libel of Belle as &#8220;an accomplished prostitute&#8221; in the New York Herald by the reporter William Clark in the week after the Battle of Front Royal.  It was a creative choice that not everyone is happy with, but one I stand by, given that the seduction of and by Captain Keily is essential to the narrative line.  Were it not for that Belle would not have had the opportunity to spy on the Union Army staff meeting and tell Ashby of the Union plans to trap Jackson. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t write for children.  Sex was part of the mix, as were Victorian attitudes about love and marriage.  Belle&#8217;s sacrifice here cost her reputation and any hope of a &#8220;normal&#8221; life after the war.</p>
<p>As for Mati Hari:  That&#8217;s World War One.  As incredible as it may seem now, Belle&#8217;s role as a spy was well know and widely published and she was reputed to be as beautiful and seductive as Cleopatra.  That &#8220;Confederate Cleopatra was widely used as a short hand description of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmnlman</title>
		<link>http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/2008/11/15/fiction-review-the-shenandoah-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>jmnlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brettschulte.net/CWBlog/?p=2098#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting although I&#039;m slightly baffled by the title wouldn&#039;t Mata Hari make more sense than Cleopatra?  Or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting although I&#8217;m slightly baffled by the title wouldn&#8217;t Mata Hari make more sense than Cleopatra?  Or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

